Effectiveness of Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34768730/
- Urinary incontinence (UI) improved after treatment with magnetic stimulation (MS). The ICIQ-UI SF score improved in patients regardless of the type of UI. However, the greatest decrease in post-treatment assessment ICIQ-UI SF scores was seen in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Based on the findings described above, it can be concluded that MS is a successful non-invasive conservative method for treating UI.
An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591355/
- According to the results of the meta-analysis, magnetic stimulation (MS) therapy relieved urinary incontinence (UI) symptoms evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score. In addition, the frequency of UI in the MS treatment group was also alleviated compared with sham group. Finally, MS treatment improved the quality of life of patients with UI. Our meta-analysis preliminarily indicates that MS treatment is an effective therapeutic modality for patients with UI.
Electromyographic Evaluation of the Pelvic Muscles Activity After Electromagnetic Procedure
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32146133/
- This study documented that the HIFEM procedure was significantly more effective than electrical stimulation in treatment of PFD in postpartum women. Both the objective and subjective evaluation indicates more profound effects of magnetic stimulation.
Effects of Electromagnetic Technology for the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Muscles and Incontinence
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31860567/
- Posttreatment results suggest that HIFEM technology is suitable for treatment of PFMs weakening and showed to be more effective when compared with electrostimulation in short-term. Therefore, we recommend HIFEM as treatment option for weakened PFMs and UI.
Possible Side Effects in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence with Magnetic Stimulation
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37512097/
- Based on the findings in the literature to date, it can be concluded that MS is a good and effective method of treating UI, which causes fewer adverse side effects than electrostimulation. Unlike electrostimulation, MS generally does not cause pain.
Safety and Efficacy of Electromagnetic Device for Urinary Incontinence and Quality of Life
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31172580/
- This study demonstrated that HIFEM technology is able to safely and effectively treat a wide range of patients suffering from urinary incontinence. After six treatments, an improvement in ICIQ-SF score and reduction in absorbent pads usage was observed. Based on subjective evaluation, these changes positively influenced quality of life.
Pelvic Floor HIFEM in Men Improves Ejaculation
https://academic.oup.com/jsm/article-abstract/19/Supplement_1/S69/7013042?redirectedFrom=fulltext
- We conclude that HIFEM boosts the strength of the bulbocavernosus and ischiocavernosus muscle and the pelvic floor resulting in an increase in volume, force, duration and intensity of ejaculation.